[lucerna] 'neo-stone age spirituality

Lucerna Discussion lucerna@lists.newearth.org
Wed Jun 28 05:28:14 HST 2006

Dear David R. Chambers, I am going to attempt an approach to the subject we 
are discussing from a different angle (perhaps an angle Richard Campbell 
will appreciate). In describing the Most Ancient Church, the Third Testament 
suggests that these people were in a higher state of perception than we are, 
and could see spiritual things represented in natural things. (An example of 
this from a scientific point of view may be found in Rachel Levy’s Ph. D. 
thesis 'Religious Conceptions of the Stone Age,' popularly published as 'The 
Gate of Horn' [1948], in which she interprets the cave paintings from 
Lascaux and Altimira and other such Stone Age things.) It is fair to surmise 
that Stone Age peoples may have been involved with their natural world in 
entirely different ways than we are today. Indeed, we know that the Tree of 
Knowledge refers to spiritual science, but it can also stand in for the vast 
array of natural scientific knowledges that inform and control our lives at 
this day, and do much to block our ability to develop spiritual life or 
awareness (the ‘materialism’ card).

Certainly the Stone Age people did not enjoy natural life to the degree we 
do, and I think there are few at this day who’d wish to go back to a Stone 
Age existence. The Stone Age people were only scratching the surface of 
understanding the natural world, and I posit it as analogous to where we are 
at this day in relation to scratching the surface of understanding spiritual 
life. Thus, when you write, “I don't believe we have to be totally perfected 
in genuine truths from the Lord, before we can begin to impart this 
information to others,” I think the perfecting process goes on to eternity. 
To say, “Leon may have not reached a state of perfection yet,” is not the 
central point, but it may explain reserved caution. Certainly we attempt “to 
impart [our] information to others,” but I think it is perfectly natural 
that others will receive information cautiously (without that being 
negativity).  To adopt this cautious approach, to have a reserved 
“affirmative attitude,” is NOT the same thing as “never allow[ing] the 
possibility of the Lord's prophecy ever to be fulfilled.” I feel you 
‘protesteth’ too vigorously. Alan

>Reply-To: Organization and government issues <reform@novahierosolyma.org>
>To: reform@novahierosolyma.org
>Subject: Re: [reform] turnabout's fair play
>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:07:33 EDT
>Dear Stephen,
>Well, I'm reluctant to because as I stated at the  beginning, my intention
>was to simply provide my observation and leave it at  that.
>Leon, has in fact explained the point far better than I  can, in his 
>e-mail today (Re: [reform] turnabout's fair play), but in  case that 
>answer your question precisely:
>when presented with Leon's declaration of a new doctrine  from the Lord, 
>tendency was to dismiss or discredit it by  providing numerous search 
>quotes (sorry Alan, I know you don't like  these) to the effect that only
>someone who is in genuine truths from the Lord  can be imparted the 
>sense. Although an unarguable statement in itself,  used to respond to 
>offering of the DOW, etc., the only impression one  could assume from it, 
>is that
>you don't consider him (or anyone, for that  matter) to be in genuine 
>so the DOW must be false. When yet, only  the Lord can decide who is, and 
>is not.
>Also in Leon's reply today, he clearly demonstrates that  such spiritual
>insights can only come through others (and always given the  benefit of the 
>that they are indeed in genuine truths from the  Lord) to be confirmed
>personally by us when we have that 'Aha!' moment by the  Lord. But not to 
>prevent others from perhaps being  enlightened, with Scriptural quotes to 
>contrary, when we don't yet see  something ourselves.
>As a newcomer to the NC, perhaps I may provide an  example from personal
>experience how this works?
>If so; before I discovered the Writings at 17 years old, I  use to read the
>bible, completely isolated from any church influence. As I said  in my 
>biography, I was the only one in my family with any 'religious'  tendency.
>Consequently, in those formative years, I read the Word and understood  it 
>only a 'personal' relationship with God for understanding. As a result,  
>(and as
>you can imagine) my interpretation of it was with a very 'Jewish' or OT
>mentality (even to becoming a practising 'jew' for a short while!)
>However, by discovering Swedenborg, I was provided  through this 'other
>person' (a man, like any other man) a spiritual sense to the  OT & NT.
>If however, I had read your assertion that no one is in  genuine truth from
>the Lord, then I would have dismissed Swedenborg's  revelations instantly. 
>had to have the positive bias that Swedenborg was in  genuine truths from 
>Lord, for it to benefit me in any way.
>However, since that tender age and up until recently  (and still in 
>from any Church), I've had the present GC idea  that the Writings were
>speaking about the spiritual sense of the OT & NT,  not that it also 
>applied to the
>Heavenly Doctrines. It was all I could  know; no one had enlightened me to 
>So, once again, this new insight had to come through  someone else; Leon
>James. And, had I not positively assumed him to be in genuine  truths from 
>Lord, I would have dismissed this spiritual sense as from his  own
>self-intelligence. Now however, that I've discovered through others (DHL,  
>LNC) that they
>too have positively accepted a spiritual sense to the  Writings, I'm taken 
>another level of understanding which I hope will  continue to eternity.
>I consider this next step to be the DOW and Theistic  Psychology, because 
>'personal' relationship with the Lord now, is in the  new understanding 
>His Mind is the true Heaven, and to enter that 'Mind', I  have to align my 
>with His (what we refer to as regeneration, or being in  the Lord's
>The spiritual sense of the Writings (in other words,  Theistic Psychology)
>helps me to achieve this because I now realise instead of  the Lord being 
>there' in the form of the Spiritual Sun, that He is  constantly working 
>of me as a Divine Psychologist actively healing my  mind/proprium by 
>and opening various societies from the heavens and the  hells in my 
>as I co-operate with Him by shunning evils, doing good  and extracting the
>spiritual doctrine of the Writings. And in the  meantime, sharing any 
>insights I
>may receive (like my Theistic Astronomica  pages) to the degree that I too,
>acquire genuine truths from the Lord. (Which I  also hope will be received 
>with a
>positive bias, but still closely examined for  their validity.)
>In other words, I don't believe we have to be totally  perfected in genuine
>truths from the Lord, before we can begin to impart this  information to
>others. There will be things about the DOW that are right, and  things 
>about it that
>are wrong (which Ian Thompson and I have already expressed  to Leon), but 
>don't reject it entirely simply because Leon may have not  reached a state 
>perfection yet. Instead we confirm those truths that are  revealed to us, 
>place aside the others that haven't, for another  day.
>(Sorry this is so long, but I think I've said all I can  say on the matter
>Warm regards,

>reform mailing list

More information about the lucerna mailing list