[lucerna] didn't! didn't!

Lucerna Discussion lucerna@lists.newearth.org
Thu Jul 6 07:52:31 HST 2006


I DIDN'T want to confuse the issue. Sorry. Alan


>To: lucerna@novahierosolyma.org
>Subject: nothing "substantive," always  "socially sensitive"
>Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:47:05 -0400

I said I did want to be a distraction: I guess it was my knee-jerk reaction 
to seeing the discussion shift to Lucerna. I really intended nothing and 
should have remained silent. Best wishes, Alan
>
>
>>Reply-To: Discussion on doctrine drawn out of the Latin Word<>
>>To: Discussion on doctrine drawn out of the Latin 
>>Word<lucerna@novahierosolyma.org>
>>Subject: Re: [lucerna] [L] RE: Jewish Church &  LNC
>>Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:42:22 -1000 (HST)
>On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Alan Longstaff wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Alan Longstaff wrote:
>
>>Since this is on Lucerna, even though I don't want to confuse the issue,
>>there is something here that takes me back to Greg's CONCERN about being
>>very clear about specific words like "CALAM*". Alan
>
>Hi Alan, I'm not completely sure what you mean exactly. I'm not offering it 
>as
>"hair-splitting" semantic issue (to use Barrie's language about what we
>are doing on Relform). Why would I do that? You know my interests and
>level of thinking.
>
>The issue is substantive and socially sensitive. It will impact the New
>Church for centuries to come -- depending on how that issue is handled.
>
>Have you seen my (partly auto-biographical) article on the issue of
>anti-semitism in the Writings?
>
>Anti-semitism and Holocaust Theology
>http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj//anti-semitism.htm
>
>Aloha, Leon
>
>
>
>> >Reply-To: Discussion on doctrine drawn out of the Latin
>> >Word<lucerna@novahierosolyma.org>
>> >To: lucerna@novahierosolyma.org
>> >Subject: [lucerna] Jewish Church and the LNC are to be one
>> >Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:33:25 -1000 (HST)
>>
>
>





More information about the lucerna mailing list